In conjunction with the ITAM Review, 1E are hosting an event in London on April 21st from 4pm which will discuss three Software Asset Optimization / ITAM related topics, including the benchmark study and Reclaim.
1E have produced a very interesting study (available here) which analysed data from over 1.8m desktops across 74 companies and took over two years to compile. According to the IT Financial Analyst team which put the study together, on average 28% of software hasn’t been used in more than 90 days and a further 6% hasn’t been used in 30 days or more – that’s 33% of software which your company has paid for, which isn’t being used on the machines it is deployed to. That adds up to a LOT of waste… actually to $7 billion for the top 35 titles.
The question here is – what is the real value of “Software Reclaim” – the process of removing the under-used software.
Buffi Neal is a 20+ year veteran of the IT industry, and a key member of the 1E IT Financial Analyst team. “If you remove a $300 piece of software, the vendor isn’t going to come out and write you a check for $300 – unfortunately the saving doesn’t work like that.” says Neal, and she should know. She and her fellow analysts have helped hundreds of companies quantify the impact of implementing Software Reclaim. Before AppClarity (the 1E tool which enables analysis of software usage and which automates reclaim) is deployed to a company, she helps that company determine which titles to target and what savings to expect. After AppClarity has been run, she works with the customer to quantify realized savings. She led the analysis for the 1E Software Waste Benchmark study and has seen the real life implication of Reclaim.
According to Buffi there are three main areas where software, once reclaimed, provides savings:
Just taking into account the top 35 titles, the average value of unused software is $224 per employee in the US and £154 in the UK. How much of that money can be actually saved?
The 1E IT Financial Analyst team have identified that depending on factors like company growth (or reduction), industry sector and hardware refresh rates – software purchasing normally increases by 10 to 12% per annum. “It seems odd, but the data shows that even in companies where employee numbers drop, software purchases still increase,” says Neal. Even at a conservative reclamation rate of 75% of unused and minimal purchase rate of 10% annually, purchase avoidance due to reuse of harvested software is estimated to be greater than $182 per user.
20% is the typical rate for software maintenance costs. As such, companies are paying $45 or so per user in maintenance on software that isn’t being used. Reclaim can eliminate a portion of that cost. Additional maintenance will be avoided on purchase reduction, realising an additional estimated $37 per user over 3 years.
A number of the titles which have the highest rates of “un-use” are commonly audited. For example, the data shows that > 51% of Attachmate Reflection X installations are not actively used. In the event of audit by a vendor, you are typically liable to pay for under-licensed software on the basis of installation, not use. If you are actively Reclaiming software, you are less likely to be over deployed or over licensed. The value of improved compliance or reduced audit risk is hard to quantify, but it certainly has a value. Buffi points out that “Just looking at the letter A, Autodesk, Adobe and Attachmate all perform audits frequently, those vendors all show up in the top 10 list for under used software, and their applications can be quite expensive. Customers gain significant benefit in terms of reducing audit risk by ensuring Reclaim and associated reduced installation counts is a business as usual activity”.
Unused software will lead to waste – and about 28% of software is unused. The good news is, if you implement an active Software Reclaim policy, combined purchased and maintenance avoid is estimated to average $73 per user per year. Spanning 3 years, $182/user can be recouped. Those numbers quickly add up to something which IT Asset Managers and their colleagues in Endpoint computing and IT Operations should be collaborating on to improve the software waste situation in their organizations.
In conjunction with the ITAM Review, 1E are hosting an event in London on April 21st from 4pm which will discuss three ITAM related topics, including the benchmark study and Reclaim.
The sessions will be hosted by 1E Subject Matter Experts Jason Keogh, Dave Harding and Nathaniel Martinez (another member of the IT Financial Analyst team, co-author of the Software Usage report). Martin Thompson of the ITAM Review will MC the event and referee discussions on the topics after each presentation. Snacks, beer and wine are of course on hand! If you can get to London on the 21st of April 2015, do drop down and join us.